Cultural Cohesion

We live in a world where cultural cohesion has become irrelevant.

It seems that the respect for cultural cohesion has gone, and there are no mechanisms in place to maintain cultural stability and balance anymore either. Subsequently, hate crimes and cultural or racial violence have increased.

Many have said that it's wrong to expect other races and cultures to integrate into the countries, areas they choose to settle in when there is an existing culture or set of cultures that already exist there; this is the Globalist-Marxist view.

Though, cultural cohesion and respect for other cultures is important, even if many aligned with the Globalist-Marxist ideologies pretend it's not, and expect the host culture or host cultures to adapt to the requirements of their guest; in such a way that is foreign or alien to their own way of life, outside the context of their own culture(s).

If we look at the foreign nationals, let's say 150 years ago who emigrated to countries such as UK Countries, China, the USA and Canada and integrated into the existing cultural settings. We can see that in many cases they utilised their spaces and structures, and adapted to their language(s). Often resulting in good cohesion in those areas and, subsequently, a good place to promote true diversity and raise your children.

The only real exception was when western nations, through colonisation, stripped away the rights of the native populations in order to position themselves above them as a controlling power.

Of course, the Globalist-Marxists families with power and influence have been working behind the scenes since the early part of the 1800s with a plan for a one-world Globalist state. Which, at the core, is actually Marxism. That vision failed with the European Project in 1855 after they tried to unite Europe under Marxism.

However, behind the scenes, it still existed in some form and resurfaced as Socialism around the 1930s; later becoming Globalism around the 1950s.

Globalism (Globalist-Marxism) actually changed the dynamics within societies and subsequently created the mass multiculturalism effect across the western world in line with the one-world vision.

Now, it's important to note that I have friends and family from all over the world, across cultures, races and even religions. My wife is Chinese and we have children together. I am not rejecting the coming together of cultures through natural migration to other countries. Rather, I am against multiculturalism on a mass scale.

If we look at the state of the world across western nations in the modern context, after many decades of social engineering through mass immigration, we can see that the countries with the most unstable communities are within western nations.

This instability problem is a direct result of mass immigration where entire communities from another country or cultural blocks are allowed to take over and dominate an entire area in a host country.

With the right mechanisms in place, cultures wishing to settle in another country should be evenly dispersed to promote and respect cultural cohesion. The host country is not their country and their cultures may be completely different from those of the host country. The host country should not be forced to change their cultural values to accommodate other cultures from outside its country.

This is the problem with the Globalist-Marxist view that all cultures are irrelevant and should make way for other cultures in the name of diversity. It's the reason why so many in the modern context in western nations don't really feel like they have an identity, why so many don't really feel they belong anywhere; this extends to both the guest and host cultures.

One pretends they are living in their country whilst actually living in another country, subsequently being conflicted by the reality that they are not; because they have to interact with people from the host country and, follow their rules and use their infrastructure.

Whereas the other is forced to accept a reality that a part of their country is no longer representative of what it once was, it stands in opposition to the original set of cultural values and there is no cultural cohesion or respect for the previous cultural aspects of that area.

The guest cultures in the context of mass immigration form their own communities, speak their own languages, run their own business, have their own temples, schools, etc... all these places are either void of the guest countries native languages, or they are multilingual; they literally stand in opposition to the native languages and cultures of the guest country.

During such a transition, let's say over two decades, there are many hostilities. These hostilities are further exacerbated by adopting ignorance of the overall issue and labelling anyone who dares have a voice against it.

Those who stand in opposition are likely not culturalist or racist. A majority of them would not initially carry any hatred or bias towards those guest cultures. What is actually happening, is that people being forced out and invalidated are frustrated and reacting in a defensive way because they have been forced into a position where they feel powerless and irrelevant.

Many of these concerns are ignored, as such as the problem is, the opposition to what's happening usually becomes hateful and discriminative.

This is all wrong, they are just people seeking a better life. The problems that all sides face are a direct result of western government policies.

We should be educating people to come together and, for those immigrating to respect the host countries existing cultural sets, to enable them to build together and form a stable cohesion as one set of peoples; whilst recognising what makes us different and, celebrating those differences.