Labelling and Wording: "It's Only Creating Division"

In some cases labelling is important for positioning; it's a way to distinguish between a certain thing, person, or group of people.

Such as:

men/males/boys and women/females/girls

Neuro-Divergents and Neuro-Typicals

Leaders and Followers

British and American

African and Jamaican

However, in a wokist society labels are used unnecessarily to force a separation between people or a group of people, whilst wording in such a way to frame one person or one group in a bad light over the other (juxtapositioning).

Examples of this are:

Black v White

Men v Women

Straight v Homosexual

People or a group of people who are juxtapositioned lower are constantly forced fed the narrative that they are the problem; in many cases,academics it's a guilt trip to portray a person or an entire group with a blanket view or perception.

Here are some more examples:

"A black man was beaten to death by a white man in a racist attack; police say he had links to the far right."

Or

"a white man was beaten to death by a black man; police say the white man instigated the racist attack."

In reality"

"BLM activist attacks a man from an opposition march; it was a hate attack by the BLM activist against another man of a different race.

More examples:

"Old white men reject young females from joining an acedemics club at their University"

"A group of black women fight back against old white men trying to gain dominance in an all-white University"

In reality:

Feminist activists initiate a violent attack on a University over an all-male academics club they were not allowed to join; in a statement from the University "We were not preventing women or any ethnic groups from being created at this University. All are welcome to create their own individual academics clubs or groups."

Looking at the above we are shown one entirely inflated narrative through wokist positioning and made to think and feel as if there is something happening that we as a gender or race have to feel ashamed of.

In reality, all that does is create division and hatred and misrepresents the real truth; the truth becomes convoluted.

When we examine the statements above regarding the BLM activist:

There were two marches taking place in London. One was for BLM and the other for Unite.

BLM are a Marxist and racist terrorist organisation at the core; they allow the race they oppose to march with them for show.

Unite, was a much smaller movement in relation to all lives matter regardless of race or gender.

Both were marching in different parts of London, but nearby. The BLM group got through the barricades and initiated a violent attack against unite, but were held back by police.

One BLM activist got through and attacked a Unite activist in a racist attack. Other Unite activists cowardly ran away to avoid the conflict and did not help their fellow man as he was being attacked.

The problem, however, is that the mainstream media flipped the entire perspective to portray Unite as the instigators of violence.

Next, we look at the case with the University:

A University in the USA had an all-male academics club and an all-female academics club.

The male academics club has existed for over a hundred years and has more grounding.

The female academics club has existed for 40 years and is still gaining momentum.

Feminists wanted to join the all-male academics club solely because it represented patriarchy and needed to be dominated.

The University refused because it's an "All-male academics club". They were prepared to make changes to the all-female club to provide more opportunities for women.

But, it's not about equality for women at all. Such leftist fake feminist movements are anti-male and seek to dilute or destroy and form of male dominance; it's a power play!

Thus creating an inequality if they win, where the all-female club continues to exist and the all-male club ceases to be and instead becomes mixed gender.

What I am trying to achieve here is thinking a different way with a stepping back approach to thinking.

Allow your own mind to reject the first narratives that are being presented to enable you to think clearly and gain an objective perspective.

Therefore, when you write or speak about it, you can champion change using the right wording, without using the divisive labelling and wokist juxtapositioning as you explain.

There is no black v white as we are all one peoples; we are all human, so we should reject such labels.

There is no men v women; we are two halves of one instance who need each other to balance and come together in harmony using what makes us different to unite with great strength.

Those who have offset this balance should be challenged, but an awakened mind must champion the wording they use and unite people or inspire them to change!