Proving Innocence

This is another difficult post to write. It pertains to the response made by the French geneticist giving evidence on day 4 of the Grand Jury trial.

She stated that there are two types of victims in regard to informed consent, rather than answer the question asked about informed consent in relation to the victims of the vaccines who had not been given any.

The first victim she positioned as the misinformed Dr's who had given the vaccines and stated how they had faced an unprecedented situation and had become overwhelmed by the scale and severity of the situation to the point that they had to rely heavily on the advice from the government and those providing the information where they worked.

Her response triggered brief hostilities from a lawyer and another doctor who disagreed with her statements, and that such Dr's issuing the Covid-19 vaccines could not plead ignorance in their defence.

Because of how she had worded her statements, I too disagreed with what she was saying, as initially during the start of the supposed pandemic they could plead ignorance. However, as patterns started to emerge, it should have already become clear that something was not right and that those Dr's should then have started refusing to inject any more people.

One could argue that they were afraid of being outcasted, to the point of losing their job, credibility and facing difficulties with their families as their livelihood and reputation ended up being torn to shreds deliberately in a disinformation campaign against them for even daring to go against the mainstream narratives.

However, other Dr's in a similar position resorted to swapping the vials and injected the patients with saline instead or just risked everything to make a stand.

That's with the people who are aware, but, as I lay sleeping last night my brain whirred away and started to require some further thought regarding those types of people who are blissfully unaware.

Initially, I believed that these people were simply ignorant and had been conditioned in such a way that they would not question anything that was wrong around them. This remains true for those who are aware and even those on the fence or those who are just emerging.

But, I have seen the behaviour of people when their thinking has been reprogrammed, I now seriously doubt they have any real control over their thinking, especially those injected with nanotechnology to the point they have become mostly autonomous like drones.

Has anybody tried to corner these people? They become disorientated, confused and agitated; most of what they say in response is disjointed and incoherent. It's already clear to be that they are not of free minds, and are actually a victim of mind control; they have been programmed to think and behave in that way.

I highly doubt a Dr with a higher mind would be of that group of drones, some nurses and lower level medical staff maybe; those who are meek and easily influenced. Obviously not all nurses, there is a type I am thinking about who don't interact with the patients as it's just a job, and they rush through tasks just to get through the day with little care for the patients, that's the type I am referring to.

To conclude: Although there may be some Dr's who are like drones, I am convinced they would be of a very low number, and that the majority are consciously aware and in control of their own minds due to being of higher mind states. Therefore, it does not matter if they are a victim or not, most of them are not, and it's impossible to determine which are which. This ultimately means that all of them should be prosecuted for their involvement in harming or killing their patients; they have a hippocratic oath as Dr's and once they start injecting they violate that oath, so they can't plead ignorance.